On February 9, 2024, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry of India announced that the country’s current patent and copyright legal framework can protect the works and related innovations generated by artificial intelligence.Therefore, there is no need to regulate new rights separately for artificial intelligence.According to the press release issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry of India, India’s "Copywriter Law 1957" provides full and effective civil and criminal relief measures for infringement activities including digital avoidance.In order to determine whether the existing law is sufficient to adapt to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, Mumbai Krishnamurthy & Co. Gautam K.MJaipur Wealth Management. M.m.m.And how to understand the relationship between these terms and artificial intelligence generation.According to the "Copyright Law of 1957", the author is usually defined as "the person who promotes the creation of the work".According to Article 2 of the Law, item I to V, the author can be the author of literature or drama works, producers, photographers, composers or artists of film or recording products.It can also be a person who enables computers to generate literature, drama, music or art works."Although the simple interpretation of these definitions of these definitions can give people a impression that when the authors of such works are awarded the identity of such works, they do not particularly need the participation of human authors.Natural persons can claim the authors identity of the works created and protected according to the law.As for the word "everyone", Gao Tam said that Article 17 of the "Copyright Law 1957" clearly stipulates the different examples of the ownership of the protection of natural persons created by natural persons such as the government and international organizations based on service contracts or apprenticeship contracts.However, the Indian court has not yet discussed the ownership of the content of artificial intelligence and showed its position.Gauntm also said: "The necessity of this jurisprudence exceeds the scope of the author and owner who determines the copyright -protected works. It also needs to determine the applicability and execution of this right.It is not a natural person or a legal person’s entityKolkata Wealth Management. It can neither enjoy all the interests provided by the bill, including spiritual rights, nor the responsibility of any unauthorized use or punishment in the existing structure.It will have to analyze the scope and nature of these new era technology and modify legislation accordingly.ANKIT SAHNI uses the registration of the two -dimensional artwork "Sareast" made by Raghav artificial intelligence painting application (Raghav)Jaipur Stock. Sani listed himself and artificial intelligence tools as the author of the work.According to Gauntm, the protection period of copyright is not determined, because Article 22 stipulates that the copyright protection period is the life of the author’s life and the 60 -year calculation of the calendar year of the year of the author’s death.In the case of joint authors, the 60 -year period should be calculated based on the author who died."Through the popular interpretation and literal interpretation of Article 22, this means that the above works will never be provided in the public field, because unlike human beings, artificial intelligence does not exist in the death.Adapt to the dynamic nature of technology in the new era, then artificial intelligence may permanently enjoy copyright, thereby violating the true intention of legislationAgra Investment. "
Jaipur Stock
